The rise of the 5-2-3/5-4-1

In 2016 the 5-defender systems are flourishing in Germany  probably more than ever. The first signs were visible in 2015, when Werder Bremen neutralized Bayern’s positional play effectively with their 5-4-1, though we would have never thought that this and the 5-2-3 could be the best defensive system against Bayern Munich or Borussia Dortmund.

Bayern Munich had an amazing run in the first half of the season, with their new false full-back concept and reversed-pyramid offensive shape they looked unstoppable. Although now these concepts are not as effective as they were 3-4 months ago, as Bundesliga teams – and Juventus – found the possibly best defensive formation against Bayern’s and Dortmund’s offensive shape: the 5-2-3/5-4-1.

In Bayern’s offensive shape the wingers provide width all the time, as the full-backs are occupying the halfspaces – in a false full-back role. With this positioning their main goal is to create 1v1 situations for the wingers with horizontal circulations. The offensive shape forms a 2-3-5, which is perfect to maintain the possession, while circulating the ball, and capable of counterpress instantly,- if needed – which is very important against Bundesliga teams – as it was written in Pep Confidental, Guardiola had to create a system, which is effective in possession against horizontally  and vertically compact teams, while maintains the stability in the positional structure, to not get caught by counterattacks, in what German teams are so good at. Dortmund’s shape is very similar, although there it’s the full-backs, who are providing width, and the wingers are occupying the halfspaces up front. Both teams main goal is to stretch the opponent’s defensive shape horizontally, in order to open up space for the winger, – for a 1v1 – or for the full-back – who can cross/ cutback etc.

That’s why the 5-4-1/5-2-3 is perfect against them. With 5 defenders at the back it’s almost impossible to stretch them horizontally, plus it’s very effective against vertical passes – using man-marking.

1

The system’s biggest advantage although is it’s flexibility: even if a FB presses high, there are still 4 defenders at the back, therefore the positional structure doesn’t lose it’s stability. That’s why Juventus were very effective in pressing Bayern at build-ups, as the wingers defended the false FBs in the halfspaces, and the FBs could step up to close down the wingers, leaving no option for Bayern -only long balls.

1a
Example from Bayern-Juventus.
7
Another example from Bayern-Juve, no chance for verticality, Bayern is being forced towards the sidelines.
7
Mainz’s 5-2-3 against Bayern , Alaba drives forward, but he has no vertical options – maybe RCM, but that pass is too risky, and the LCB is able to close him down immediately if needed.

In this system the wingers are closing down the halfspaces, but from there both the centre, and the flanks are available for them -using the halfspaces well in defensive phases. Therefore the system is capable of defending against double-width offensive systems – where both the FBs and the wingers are occupying the flanks. What does it prove again? The flexibility.

4
Dortmund against Augsburg’s 5-2-3: RCB can’t find verticality, they are forced towards the flanks, where both the CAM and the RW are closed down, RB has to pass backwards.
12
Another situation, LCB may drive forward, although his vertical option – the LW – is being man-marked. As the front 3 is very narrow it doesn’t let vertical passes through the centre -even if a passing lane opens up, the 2 CMs may close the opponent’s down with man-marking.

Although it’s very tough to break through these shapes, it’s not impossible. Of course every shape has it’s own weaknesses, you just need time to explore and then exploit them. Bayern were struggling against Werder Bremen, -in October- Juventus, Mainz earlier, but they were better against Cologne this weekend, the positional play was more penetrative, than it was before.

8
As LW drops the RCB follows him for a while, but that opens up a passing lane towards the CF. Weakness of the shape and the man-orinted defending.
17
LCB drifts wide, creates a 3v2 against the CMs, LCM is wide open between the lines and may penetrate. In this picture it wasn’t the case, but using an asymmetric 3-3-4 may be a solution as well.
2
An asymmetric 3-3-4, with a left-sided overload.
10
Although according to ‘juego de posición’ 2 players mustn’t occupy the same vertical line, because they are blocking each other, but here this vertical overload helps Coman – RW – to receive and turn with the ball between the lines, as the RCM blocks the LCB, who can’t step up to close down the RW.
4
Another example for the vertical overload, LCM – Thiago – is open as the RCM blocks the LCB for him.
12
CF – Lewandowski – blocks the RCB, therefore LCM – Thiago – is open between the lines.
1'a
Same concept against Werder Bremen.
27a
1-3-6 against the 5-4-1 as a probable solution.
14
Exploiting this system’s man-oriented defending, as CF drops it pulls out the LCB, opening up a passing lane for RCM to run into.

I think it’s important to note that Pep also uses this system in defending & pressing. The DM drops in between the 2 CBs, which gives them flexibility, the CBs may follow their man in the halfspaces knowing that the DM is behind them, providing defensive depth support. When they are pressing, they start from a 5-4-1 formation most of the time, and if a CM has to step up to press to opponent’s CB, then the DM has to step up as well, and then they form a 4-4-2.

13a
Bayern’s 5-4-1 against Juventus in defending.

To sum up, the trending of the 5-4-1/5-2-3 is not a coincidence, because this formation provides a wide variety of tools  – flexibility! – in defending & pressing, plus it’s very effective against teams, who like to circulate the ball much in order to open up vertical passing lanes.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: