In 2016 the 5-defender systems are flourishing in Germany probably more than ever. The first signs were visible in 2015, when Werder Bremen neutralized Bayern’s positional play effectively with their 5-4-1, though we would have never thought that this and the 5-2-3 could be the best defensive system against Bayern Munich or Borussia Dortmund.
Bayern Munich had an amazing run in the first half of the season, with their new false full-back concept and reversed-pyramid offensive shape they looked unstoppable. Although now these concepts are not as effective as they were 3-4 months ago, as Bundesliga teams – and Juventus – found the possibly best defensive formation against Bayern’s and Dortmund’s offensive shape: the 5-2-3/5-4-1.
In Bayern’s offensive shape the wingers provide width all the time, as the full-backs are occupying the halfspaces – in a false full-back role. With this positioning their main goal is to create 1v1 situations for the wingers with horizontal circulations. The offensive shape forms a 2-3-5, which is perfect to maintain the possession, while circulating the ball, and capable of counterpress instantly,- if needed – which is very important against Bundesliga teams – as it was written in Pep Confidental, Guardiola had to create a system, which is effective in possession against horizontally and vertically compact teams, while maintains the stability in the positional structure, to not get caught by counterattacks, in what German teams are so good at. Dortmund’s shape is very similar, although there it’s the full-backs, who are providing width, and the wingers are occupying the halfspaces up front. Both teams main goal is to stretch the opponent’s defensive shape horizontally, in order to open up space for the winger, – for a 1v1 – or for the full-back – who can cross/ cutback etc.
That’s why the 5-4-1/5-2-3 is perfect against them. With 5 defenders at the back it’s almost impossible to stretch them horizontally, plus it’s very effective against vertical passes – using man-marking.
The system’s biggest advantage although is it’s flexibility: even if a FB presses high, there are still 4 defenders at the back, therefore the positional structure doesn’t lose it’s stability. That’s why Juventus were very effective in pressing Bayern at build-ups, as the wingers defended the false FBs in the halfspaces, and the FBs could step up to close down the wingers, leaving no option for Bayern -only long balls.
In this system the wingers are closing down the halfspaces, but from there both the centre, and the flanks are available for them -using the halfspaces well in defensive phases. Therefore the system is capable of defending against double-width offensive systems – where both the FBs and the wingers are occupying the flanks. What does it prove again? The flexibility.
Although it’s very tough to break through these shapes, it’s not impossible. Of course every shape has it’s own weaknesses, you just need time to explore and then exploit them. Bayern were struggling against Werder Bremen, -in October- Juventus, Mainz earlier, but they were better against Cologne this weekend, the positional play was more penetrative, than it was before.
I think it’s important to note that Pep also uses this system in defending & pressing. The DM drops in between the 2 CBs, which gives them flexibility, the CBs may follow their man in the halfspaces knowing that the DM is behind them, providing defensive depth support. When they are pressing, they start from a 5-4-1 formation most of the time, and if a CM has to step up to press to opponent’s CB, then the DM has to step up as well, and then they form a 4-4-2.
To sum up, the trending of the 5-4-1/5-2-3 is not a coincidence, because this formation provides a wide variety of tools – flexibility! – in defending & pressing, plus it’s very effective against teams, who like to circulate the ball much in order to open up vertical passing lanes.